I found the Librarians Index to the Internet very useful for a broad topic such as "buddhism" but as soon as I tried one of my student's history day topics I got nothin'. I tried to search for "minneapolis teacher strike of 1970." Apparently that was too specific for this index. I would have a hard time selling this to my kids for history day but maybe for another project I could tell them about this tool. I would probably compare it to a search engine like Google so that they could make the connection.
I liked how the Internet Public Library had the KidSpace and Subject Collections with Sub-headings. Again, it was not helpful with a specific search.
I did not like docuticker since I could not figure it out at all. I thought it was very unfriendly. I would never introduce this to my kids.
DMOZ and Complete planet were just "okay". I gotta be honest and say that I did not LOVE any of these sites very much. In a "google-world" it is hard to work with other ways of doing searches.
I also think it is important for kids to learn to evaluate sites for themselves. It is a good skill to have. Even though they get impatient and want immediate answers. They need to work on slowing down and looking at the reliability of sites.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Thing 14: reliable sites
Posted by Sarah Rother at 10:53 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Reliability is an ongoing struggle. . . when we teach them to evaluate their websites in language arts, they go through all the assignments, then revert to wikipedia. It's a definite challenge to get them to be critical thinkers! I wonder if having them use wikis would help them understand authorship issues better?
Post a Comment